Rated 3.5 out of 5 by 104
Rated 4 out of 5 by photobug Fit was slightly tight
Even though I returned this product, it was well made and a nice color/fabric. The fit was tight in the shoulders/bust and at the waist. It had a slight fit to the style which didn't appear in the picture.
May 23, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by TThyme WAY too small!!!!
This blouse was a nice color and style but a PL was way too small for 130 lbs and 5' 2 Bought two of these. They are even too small to be worn open with a shell underneath.
Now on to the hassle of return which I have never had to do .
May 21, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by kaydee2 shirt
shirt is VERY thin. i've had foxcroft shirts in the past, but these are SO thin in comparison. disappointing!
May 17, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by cathie14snow Size way too small.
I bought one of these shirts a year or so ago and it fit perfectly. So I wanted some more. When this shirt arrived I didn't try it on because it was the same brand and size as my other one. So I washed it and then when I went to wear it found it is way too small. I don't think it's even a size off, maybe 2 sizes off from the other shirt. Now I can't return the shirt because I washed it. Live and learn!
May 15, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by Iceblue Nice form fit
The only con is the material is thin, I bought on sale so I'm pleased but I would not pay full price. The blouse looks nice with black slacks for a business causal look.
May 15, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by 58chev Wide range of colors good buy when on sale
Fits and looks well put together. Great blouse to wear to work or for casual. It would be nice to see the price lower more often.
May 13, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by lynababy great quality
these shirts have beautiful bright colors ,if you have a full middle you might want to go a size up other than that , you can not beat the value. great to travel with, this shirt has a natural sheen no starch needed
March 29, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by kattF This product runs way too small
Going to have to return and pay return shipping because sizing was not
correct. Very disappointing!!
February 27, 2016